Lighting, WASH and Gender-Based Violence in Camp Settings | |||||||||
Literature Review revue documentaire, bibliographie Jan 2018 ; 67 pages ![]() Aut. Sue Cavill & Julie Fisher & Brian Reed & Jonathan Rouse & Jeanne Vidal Ed. OXFAM UK - Oxford WEDC - Loughborough Téléchargeable sous format: PdF ![]() Téléchargeable chez l'éditeur ![]() Abstract: Generally, poor lighting may contribute to fear of crime and specifically Gender-Based Violence (GBV), which may, in turn, further reduces the use of the WASH facilities. Improving lighting is intended to mitigate GBV, promote feelings of safety, and increase usage of WASH facilities. There is a clear call for lighting, especially of latrines and specifically in relation to feelings of safety for women and girls. What is less clear is what form this lighting should take to be effective and efficient. This literature review is part of a Humanitarian Innovation Fund (HIF) funded research project, conducted by Oxfam and the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) on lighting for safer sanitation. This project aims to provide some evidence for the sustainable interventions, based on a review of existing knowledge and good practice in humanitarian contexts. This review has the specific aim of reviewing existing literature on lighting, fear of crime and sanitation use in camp settings. Contents: Executive Summary p.2 1 Introduction p. 7 1.1 Reviewing the Literature p.7 2 Methodology p.8 3 Results p.12 3.1 Are there any existing recommendations/guidelines around lighting WASH facilities in camp settings? p.12 3.2 What do WASH/GBV experts think about the potential for lighting at WASH facilities? Do they have a preference for the kind of lighting that would be logistically easiest/most effective? p.18 3.3 What evidence exists that indicates improved lighting at WASH facilities in camp settings could reduce GBV? p.23 3.4 What evidence exists that indicates improved lighting at WASH facilities in camp settings can improve WASH facility use? p.26 4 Key learnings p.28 5 Limitations of this review p.30 6 Conclusions and Recommendations p.31 Publics-Cibles: Association , Acteurs de coopération , Décideurs locaux ou nationaux
|
|||||||||
En cas de lien brisé, nous le mentionner à communication@pseau.org |