Lebanon Response Plan (LRP) Business Continuity Plan (BCP) | |||||||||
annuaire Sep 2024 ; 39 pages ![]() Ed. IOM-Leb - OCHA - Beirut UNICEF - Beirut UNHCR - Beirut Téléchargeable sous format: PdF ![]() Abstract: Since 2019, Lebanon has been grappling with an unprecedented multi-layered political, economic, financial and public health crisis that undermines the subsistence capacity of already vulnerable populations. Individuals and families have fallen deeper into poverty due to currency depreciation, high inflation, rising food prices and loss of income. Meanwhile, Lebanon continues to be impacted by the Syria crisis, and hosts a large, displaced population, adding further pressures on already deteriorated basic services. In addition, since October 2023, the escalation of hostilities along the Southern border has led to sizable displacement and destruction, which by the end of September 2024 has turned into conflict geographically expanded to the majority of the country. The situation is extremely volatile, with registered displacement rates of over 1,000,000 people and the increasing risk of broader regional conflict. The global, regional, national crises, together with national endemic challenges have significantly strained local resources and push service capacities to their limits. Rationale for the LRP Business Continuity Plan: To respond to a rapidly changing context, the response mechanism in Lebanon holds two separates but interconnected workstreams: the LRP Business Continuity Plan (for emergencies within current response capacities) and the HCT Contingency Plan (for emergencies beyond current response capacities). The Business Continuity Plan was initially initiated in 2020 under the LCRP, triggered by COVID-19, to ensure that interventions could continue despite the rapidly changing context. It has since then been updated to encompass additional risks such as cholera, social instability, and population movements. In 2024, it was extended to the broader LRP. Contents: I. Risk Analysis, Prevention and Mitigation Measures.......................................................................3 Risk 1: Lack of containment of outbreaks and infectious diseases....................................................4 Risk 2: Sharp deterioration in protection space contributing to involuntary movements ..........8 Risk 3: Increased Social Instability.....................................................................................................15 Risk 4: Supply gaps (including wheat, fuel, electricity, and water).................................................19 Risk 5: Pressure on partners due to increasing needs ......................................................................23 Risk 6: Access Issues and Closing Operational Space ..................................................................29 Risk 7: Operational risks linked to transfer values............................................................................33 Inter-Sector preparedness measures across risks.............................................................................36 II. Emergency Preparedness and Response Coordination under the LRP ........................................37 1. Needs Assessments....................................................................................................................37 2. Contingency Stocks.....................................................................................................................38 3. Information Management .........................................................................................................38 4. Response Monitoring and Reporting.........................................................................................39 5. Remote Modalities for Provision of Services and Assistance...................................................39
|
|||||||||
En cas de lien brisé, nous le mentionner à communication@pseau.org |